CIA

You Have To Ask Better Questions.

Mr. President,
Could you get Addington to improve your vetting of government lawyers? It should be done the sooner rather than later so. You could fire all the government's lawyers and selectively re-hire them.
It would be a good way of avoiding lawyers like Jack Goldsmith and others who foolishly believe in the balance of powers, earlier in the game as you remake your presidency into a monarchy. Don't rush into it just think about it.

It's like when Goss had everyone in the CIA sign off a statement of loyalty to the president. Many government scientists and department heads have long been secured in this fashion. Some scientists have been difficult to remove like Hansen at NASA, but you still have plenty of loyal scientists in your pocket to overcome anything he says and you can impose bureaucratic media restrictions on him as well.

Sure people will argue that a record number of people have left government service as a result of new vetting practices and loyalty oaths. And yes many of the people you have lost were very talented and very experienced people at what they did but remember what Cheney keeps telling you. Take the long view. It will secure your place in history and it will provide a reassuring measure of consistency in the message when everyone is aboard. And you sure don't want the American public to get mixed messages do you?

Speaking about leaving town. Arab's professionals are leaving Iraq in droves. The once "pride of the Arab medical world" are moving out. It seems like the instability caused by your "plan for a democratic Iraq", helped them implement their exit plan.

What's with South Korea? I thought they were our allies? So how come they don't want to help you with super notes coming out of North Korea? Maybe they are more concerned with improving trade relations with their northern counterpart rather than make nice to you even though they may be getting paid in really really good looking counterfeit $100 bills.

I thought you emphatically stated that we do not negotiate with terrorists? So what's deal with today's news that American officials in Iraq are in face-to-face talks with high-level Iraqi Sunni insurgents? Has yesterday's terrorists become today's freedom fighters/partners in peace?

From: comments@whitehouse.gov
Date: January 29, 2006 4:19:28 PM CST
To: guzmatom@mac.com

On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your correspondence.
We appreciate hearing your views and welcome your suggestions.
Due to the large volume of e-mail received, the White House is
unable to respond to every message, and therefore this response
is an autoreply.

Thank you again for taking the time to write.

A Second American Revolution?

Mr. President,

It is a long known fact that humiliation, frustration and all the "divides" invite terrorism. Are you "trying" to start a second American revolution?

Bad things are happening too quickly junior and the frog in the pan is starting to notice the temperature change.

Better hire more analysts for NSA Talon and CIFA. Everyone knows most people voted against you rather than for Kerry in 2004. Add up all your “new fans” from continuing Iraq violence, Katrina, new job losses, the Medicare fiasco, Abramoff, Libby, Alito, corrupt Republican Congressmen, Delay, Iran, North Korea, South America, rising energy costs, rising health costs, lack of health insurance, (By the way your lack of credibility will sink Health Savings Accounts just like your Social Security plan), illegal immigrants, and illegal wire taps. Now you have a following! I would start by rolling back the second amendment and enlist Charleston Heston to help calm the NRA down.

Millions of people have had their lives significantly changed for the worse and yet you consistently ignore them. Worse than that, you penalize them, which only adds fuel to the fire of their discontent.

Consider pulling back the National Guard.

Count them up junior there are a lot more disadvantaged than affluent that have prospered under your regime. Everything you are doing reinforces your position as a callous and indifferent leader.

p.s.
Tell, "Rain man" that some people were embarrassed when he recently posed the following question to a number of Republicans "What do you call a dictator with a nuclear bomb? ...Sir! "
Many of them messed up the punch line and inadvertently yelled out “George Bush while others blurted out Kim Jong-il.

As of 3: 42 pm
I did not receive an automated message from the White House after I sent this one in.