Jul 2006

Israel may own the skies but Hezbollah owns the Arab world's heart.

Israel may own the skys but Hezbollah owns the Arab world's heart.
Since you won't speak with Syria, I thought I should. I sent the Syrian ambassador to the United States, Imad Moustapha an e-mail asking him what it would take to get him to intervene in the Lebanese disaster.
Hizbullah is top dog in the area now. They were formed as a backlash to Israel's occupation in 1982 and this new invasion has only strengthened their hand. Israel seem to have mimiced your half-ass effort in Iraq by not committing enough troops to get the job done.

Condi's show on the road is just that, she should include a comedian and a singer or two to entertain her hosts iinstead. Maybe if she had a USO show with her, the Arab world would have allowed her to land in one of their countries rather than having her plans modified to hold her non-meeting in Rome instead.

Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabian Sunni-led governments are panicky. The Shiite-Hezbollah have become the heroes of the Arab world. The Saudis are distancing themselves from Washington and made a huge show of making multi-million aid
pledges for Lebanon and Palestinians.

Al Qaeda has recently also piled on and called for an all out war against Israel.

The divisive and symbiotic relationship America has with Israeli has already cost us dearly. I can't imagine to what heights the Arab world will go, to punish both countries in the future.

It is not just the Arab world that has increased their disdain for America. The U.S was alone again in utilizing the UN to keep the world body from denouncing the Israelis for the killing of UN observers and to call for a cease fire.

The U.S. is once again standing alone in the world.

John Bolton's confirmation in Congress should be interesting; he has done everything possible to bring the organization
down to its knees. He has withheld payments to the organization, obstructed reforms that the UN body wanted to undertake. He has also interrupted meetings he was not even invited to. According to a New York Times article,
"They say he combatively asserts American leadership, contests procedures at the mannerly, rules-bound United Nations and then shrugs off the organization when it does not follow his lead."

Ironically today you and Blair are putting together a UN
resolution for a new international stabilization force in Lebanon and calling for the disarming of militias.

You cite the need for UN help after previously obstructing the same body at every turn through your surrogate ambassador, and after Israel apparently
targeted the killing of unarmed UN observers.

I don't expect a reply from the Syrian ambassador, but I think I have done more than you to quell the violence.

From: comments@whitehouse.gov
Date: July 28, 2006 5:09:05 PM CDT
To: guzmatom@mac.com

On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your correspondence.
We appreciate hearing your views and welcome your suggestions.
The President is committed to continuing our economic progress,
defending our freedom, and upholding our Nation's deepest values.

Due to the large volume of e-mail received, the White House
cannot respond to every message. Please visit the White House
website for the most up-to-date information on Presidential
initiatives, current events, and topics of interest to you.
In order to better receive comments from the public, a new system
has been implemented. In the future please send your comments to

Thank you again for taking the time to write.

Is everything really going as neo-conservatives planned?

Mr. President,
People from throughout the world are puzzled why you haven't taken a role in some of the many fires around the world. Is there really significant profit in war? Is there so much opportunity in unrest that your neo-cons are wetting themselves over the prospect of boosting their military-industrial complex?
  • Somalia has been overtaken by Islamist fundamentalists.
  • India and Pakistan are rattling their swords at each other over a huge terrorist attack in India.
  • Afghanistan is crumbling under new bold attacks by the Taliban.
  • North Korea is building and testing their missile technology in direct defiance of all their neighbors.
  • Iran is ignoring damn near everyone and doing what they want with whomever they want.
  • Israel added Lebanon to their "apparent "state-sponsored terrorism program after Hezbolaah hijacked the Lebanese government after Israel decided to punish ordinary Palestinians for Hamas,
  • Iraq is merrily spinning into hell.

Although you call on the UN to do something about these issues, you know the UN can't do very much. The world organization has been pockmarked by repeated attacks from your administration. John Bolton's assignment as our ambassador was the final blow to bring the world organization down to its knees.

Neo-cons like John Bolton always hated the UN. Tactics like withholding U.S. funding to the UN, obstructing any significant reform of the world body, and using our position on the Security Counsel to consistently veto any motion which even smells like a compromise, helps make the ineffectiveness of the UN to be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

You have treated the presidency like a five-year-long political campaign. The deep partisan divide in this country was no accident. It was planned. It was never about doing what is right for America. It was keeping American under extreme right-wing republican control using the fear-card whenever possible.

You never cared about how many soldiers are killed or wounded, and you made sure Americans wouldn't care either as long as you kept their bodies and the misery of their wounds away from the public. So if you turn a blind eye to dead and wounded Americans why would you care about the plight of Somalians, Palestinians, Afghanistans, Lebanese, Indians, Pakistanis, and Iraq's?
may04 may02 may05

Is this all supporting your plan to destroy international institutions? Does this world unrest help establish the neo-con dream of an imperial America with military bases strategically posted around the world to bring destruction on those countries that interfere with American interests?
Neoconservatives2 copy

Increased fighting among these countries makes them weaker, so relatively speaking, you become more powerful. But doesn't this just weaken our markets? We know how much your economic policies suck already so none of this can be helpful.

All these significant international events can be used to reinforce the idea that only Republicans can keep America safe. I can see commercials in October showing cities on fire; bodies of women and children with the message "Don't let this happen here. Vote Republican this November! This is no time to change horses, especially with Democrats who want to 'Cut and Run.'

I actually hope some one like McCain wins the 2008 presidency just to have a Republican inherit this god-awful world you helped make.

From: comments@whitehouse.gov
Date: July 17, 2006 2:57:04 PM CDT
To: guzmatom@mac.com

On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your correspondence.
We appreciate hearing your views and welcome your suggestions.
Due to the large volume of e-mail received, the White House is
unable to respond to every message, and therefore this response
is an autoreply.

Thank you again for taking the time to write.